Quantification of Pathogenic Microorganisms in River and Groundwater Samples at Riverbank Filtration (RBF) Site

Authors

  • Fauzi Baharudin School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
  • Nur Syahiza Zainuddin School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
  • Nurhidayah Hamzah School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
  • Jalina Kassim School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
  • Janmaizatulriah Jani School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/bioenv.v1i3.49

Keywords:

Pathogenic microorganism, Standard plate counts, Riverbank filtration (RBF), Water quality

Abstract

There are numerous methods for counting the number of bacterial cells in the study of microbiology. The techniques include direct microscopic counts, turbidimetric measurement, and standard plate counts (Viable Counts). The standard approach was chosen for this bacterial enumeration because it is simple to use and significantly more sensitive than turbidimetric testing. A plate count is typically performed by dilution of the original sample, 1 ml transfer onto an agar plate, and even distribution across the plate's surface. Colonies emerged when the agar plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours. Colony-forming unit (CFU) can then be computed as the total number of viable cells. To ascertain the presence of Salmonella, Shigella, and Escherichia coli bacteria, samples of river water and groundwater were subjected to water analysis. Eosin Methylene Blue (EMB) agar, Salmonella-Shigella (SS) agar, McConkey II Sorbitol agar, and Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate (XLD) agar were the four different types of agar used in the spread plate method. All plates underwent a 24 hour incubation period at 37 °C, after which the colony forming unit (CFU) per milliliter was determined.

References

Abu-Sini, M. K., Maharmah, R. A., Abulebdah, D. H., & Al-Sabi, M. N. S. (2023). Isolation and Identification of Coliform Bacteria and Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli from Water Intended for Drug Compounding in Community Pharmacies in Jordan. Healthcare, 11(3), 299. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11030299

Baharudin, F., Kassim, J., Imran, S.N.M. & Ab Wahab, M. (2021). Water Quality Index (WQI) classification of rivers in agriculture and aquaculture catchments. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environmental Science, 646, 012023.

Baharudin, F., Zailani, I., Hamzah, N. & Zaki, Z.Z.M. (2023). Assessment of river water quality improvement due to riverbank filtration (RBF) mechanism. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environmental Science, 1205, 012008.

Chen, X., Dong, W., Ou, G., Wang, Z. & Liu, C. (2013). Gaining and losing stream reaches have opposite hydraulic conductivity distribution patterns. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2569–2579.

Fetter, C.W. (2001). Applied hydrogeology (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

Gillefalk, M., Massmann, G., Nützmann, G. & Hilt, S. (2018). Potential Impacts of Induced Bank Filtration on Surface Water Quality: A Conceptual Framework for Future Research. Water, 10, 1240.

Laird, D.T., Gambrel‐Lenarz, S.A., Scher, F.M., Graham, T.E., Reddy, R. & Maturin, L.J. (2004). Chapter 6 Microbiological Count Methods, Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products. https://doi.org/10.2105/9780875530024ch06

Lin, L., Yang, H. & Xu, X. (2022). Effects of Water Pollution on Human Health and Disease Heterogeneity: A Review. Front. Environ. Sci., 10, 880246. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.880246

Meays, C., Broersma, K., Nordin, R. & Mazumder, A. (2004). Source tracking faecal bacteria critical review of current methods. J. Environ. Man., 73, 71-79.

Mokthsim, N. & Salleh, K.O. (2014). Malaysia’s effort towards achieving a sustainable development: Issues, challenges and prospects. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 120, 299-307.

Mridha, G., Hossain, M.M., Salah Uddin, M. & Masud, M.S. (2019). Study on availability of groundwater resources in Selangor state of Malaysia for an efficient planning and management of water resources. Journal of Water and Climate Change 11(4), 1-17.

Sandhu, C., Grischek, T., Börnick, H., Feller, J., & Sharma, S. (2019). A Water Quality Appraisal of Some Existing and Potential Riverbank Filtration Sites in India. Water, 11(2), 215. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w11020215

Shamrukh, M. & Abdel-Wahab, A. (2008). Riverbank filtration for sustainable water supply: Application to a large-scale facility on the Nile River. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 10, 351–358.

Some, S., Mondal, R., Mitra, D., Jain, D., Verma, D. & Das, S. (2021). Microbial pollution of water with special reference to coliform bacteria and their nexus with environment. Energy Nexus, 1, 100008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2021.100008.

Tawfik, R. G., Gawish, M. F., Abotaleb, M. M., Nada, H. S., Morsy, K., Abumandour, M. M. A., & Torky, H. (2022). Genetic Relationship between Salmonella Isolates Recovered from Calves and Broilers Chickens in Kafr El-Sheikh City Using ERIC PCR. Animals, 12(23), 3428. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12233428

Downloads

Published

2023-10-30

How to Cite

Baharudin, F., Zainuddin, N. S., Hamzah, N., Kassim, J., & Jani, J. (2023). Quantification of Pathogenic Microorganisms in River and Groundwater Samples at Riverbank Filtration (RBF) Site. Bioresources and Environment, 1(3), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.24191/bioenv.v1i3.49

Issue

Section

Environmental Sciences

Categories