Low-density particleboard from Kenaf Core and Kelempayan Particles

Authors

  • Nurrohana Ahmad Department of Wood Industry, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA Pahang, 26400 Jengka, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Ammar Imran Ab Malek Department of Wood Industry, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA Pahang, 26400 Jengka, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Wan Mohd Nazri Wan Abdul Rahman Department of Wood Industry, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA Pahang, 26400 Jengka, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Mohd Za’im Mohd Nor Department of Wood Industry, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA Pahang, 26400 Jengka, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Nur Sakinah Mohamed Tamat Faculty of Bioengineering and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, 17600 Jeli, Kelantan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/bioenv.v3i1.83

Keywords:

Hibiscus cannabinus, Neolamarckia cadamba, particle ratio

Abstract

This study investigates the feasibility of utilizing kenaf core and kelempayan as alternative raw materials for the production of low-density particleboard. These rapidly proliferating species were introduced in Malaysia to guarantee a sustained supply of wood composites. This study sought to assess the impact of different board densities and particle ratios on the mechanical and physical properties of particleboard. Panels were manufactured at three densities—300, 400, and 500 kg/m³—utilizing two particle ratios of kenaf core (KC) and kelempayan (K): 30:70 and 50:50. Urea formaldehyde (UF) resin functioned as the adhesive agent. The evaluated mechanical qualities were modulus of elasticity (MOE), modulus of rupture (MOR), and internal bonding (IB), whilst the physical properties assessed included thickness swelling (TS) and water absorption (WA), in line with Japanese Industrial Standard JIS A 5908: 2003. The findings indicated that augmenting both the density and the ratio of kenaf core enhances the mechanical and physical properties of the particleboard. Boards with a density of 500 kg/m³ exhibited superior mechanical strength, with a modulus of elasticity (MOE) of 1127 MPa, a modulus of rupture (MOR) of 7.91 MPa, and an internal bonding (IB) strength of 2.01 MPa. Nonetheless, these denser boards demonstrated subpar performance for water absorption (133%) and thickness swelling (21.94%). Moreover, particleboards with a 50:50 ratio of KC to K surpassed those with a 30:70 ratio in both mechanical and physical properties. Notwithstanding these findings, the particleboards failed to satisfy the minimum criteria established by the standard, with the exception of internal bonding (IB).

References

Anyanwu, B., A, A. O., Fayomi, O., Kuye, S. I., Igba, U., & Oluwole, O. (2019). Effects of kenaf core and bast fibers as dispersing phases on low density fiberboards (engineered wood). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1378, 022024. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1378/2/022024

Boruszewski, P., Borysiuk, P., Jankowska, A., & Pazik, J. (2022). Low-density particleboards modified with blowing agents—characteristic and properties. Materials, 15(13), 4528. doi:10.3390/ma15134528

Halip, J. A., Tahir, P. M., Choo, A. C. Y., & Ashaari, Z. (2014). Effect of kenaf parts on the performance of single-layer and three-layer particleboard made from kenaf and rubberwood. BioResources, 9(1), 1401-1416.

Gisip, J., Asri, N. L. A. M., Anwar, A. I. M., & Najib, N. A. (2022). Effects of resin content on mechanical and physical properties of treated kenaf particleboard. Scientific Research Journal, 19(2), 81-96.

Halligan, A. F. (1970). A review of thickness swelling in particleboard. Wood Science and Technology, 4(4), 301-312.

Khan, T., Acar, V., Aydin, M. R., Hülagü, B., Akbulut, H., & Seydibeyoğlu, M. Ö. (2020). A review on recent advances in sandwich structures based on polyurethane foam cores. Polymer Composites, 41(6), 2355-2400.

Lee, S. H., Lum, W. C., Boon, J. G., Kristak, L., Antov, P., Pędzik, M., ... & Pizzi, A. (2022). Particleboard from agricultural biomass and recycled wood waste: A review. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 20, 4630-4658.

Khojasteh-Khosro, S., Shalbafan, A. & Thoemen, H. (2020). Preferences of furniture manufacturers for using lightweight wood-based panels as eco-friendly products. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 78, 593-603. doi:10.1007/s00107-020-01519-8

Neitzel, N., Hosseinpourpia, R., Walther, T., & Adamopoulos, S. (2022). Alternative materials from agro-industry for wood panel manufacturing—A review. Materials, 15(13), 4542.

Solt, P., Konnerth, J., Gindl-Altmutter, W., Kantner, W., Moser, J., Mitter, R., & van Herwijnen, H. W. G. (2019). Technological performance of formaldehyde-free adhesive alternatives for particleboard industry. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 94, 99–131.

Tamat, N. S. M., Amini, M. H. M., Hermawan, A., Ramle, S. F. M., Ibrahim, W. S. F. A. W., & Rahman, W. M. N. W. A. (2023). Performance of particleboard from fast-growing species. Materials Today: Proceedings, Publish online. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.10.064

Vladimirova, E., & Gong, M. (2024). Advancements and applications of wood-based sandwich panels in modern construction. Buildings, 14(8), 2359.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-27

How to Cite

Ahmad, N., Ab Malek, A. I., Wan Abdul Rahman, W. M. N., Mohd Nor, M. Z. ., & Mohamed Tamat, N. S. . (2025). Low-density particleboard from Kenaf Core and Kelempayan Particles. Bioresources and Environment, 3(1), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.24191/bioenv.v3i1.83